CampaignStack vs Nova Recruiter (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of CampaignStack vs Nova Recruiter: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated August 5, 2026 by The AI Agent Index Editorial Team.
Data sourced from The AI Agent Index
CampaignStack
by CampaignStack
CampaignStack runs LinkedIn and email outbound from one workspace per client, capping every action at 80 percent of LinkedIn's own limits. Free plan available, paid from $82 per workspace billed annually.
Nova Recruiter
by Nova Talent
European agentic AI recruiting platform from Nova Talent with usage-based credits and MCP server. Free EUR0; Starter EUR49/mo; Growth EUR199/mo; Enterprise custom.
Capabilities
CampaignStack
Nova Recruiter
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentCampaignStack
Pros
- ✓Auto-send and human review are separate workflow nodes, so each campaign can be set to run unattended or to pause for approval.
- ✓Publishes a first-party MCP server with Bearer key authentication, so external AI agents can drive campaigns without the UI.
- ✓Every feature is included on the paid plan, with credits rather than tiers governing volume, and unused credits roll forward for six months.
Limitations
- ⚠Automated sending runs on a stored LinkedIn session cookie, and the vendor's terms make the customer responsible for not violating LinkedIn's own terms of service.
- ⚠Nine of the sixteen listed integrations are roadmap items and Apollo and HubSpot are in beta, so only LinkedIn, Sales Navigator, Instantly, Gmail, CSV and webhooks are live.
- ⚠The overage rate is published as $0.0035 per credit in the credits section and as $0.035 per credit in the pricing FAQ, a tenfold difference the vendor has not reconciled.
Nova Recruiter
Pros
- ✓Nova Recruiter publishes its own MCP server, so searches, shortlists, and outreach campaigns run directly from Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, or Cursor without opening the platform interface.
- ✓Integrates with 60+ ATS platforms bidirectionally, surfacing candidates already in the pipeline during a search and pushing new ones across automatically on a positive reply.
- ✓A dedicated privacy policy section rules out model training on customer, candidate, and message data, and Nova's contracts with its AI sub-processors require zero-retention, no-training terms.
Limitations
- ⚠No third-party security certifications of its own: the ISO 27001 and SOC 2 cited in the privacy policy belong to hosting provider Amazon Web Services, and Nova's own ISO 27001 is still in progress.
- ⚠Credit-based pricing meters contacts rather than searches: one credit equals one candidate contacted or exported, so the EUR 49 Starter tier covers 50 candidates a month before overage at EUR 1 per extra credit.
- ⚠Prices exclusively in euros with no USD option and lists both paid tiers exclusive of VAT, and data residency is EU-only, which adds friction for North American buyers.
Frequently asked questions
How does pricing compare between CampaignStack vs Nova Recruiter?
CampaignStack uses a freemium model, starting at $82 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more). Nova Recruiter uses a freemium model, starting at $49 per month.
View full CampaignStack profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
View full Nova Recruiter profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.

