Independently verified against live vendor data on Sep 24, 2026.
Transparency
Mostly Public
Contract
Monthly or Annual
Data training
Not Disclosed
Human in loop
Optional
Capabilities
deep-researchcitationsdata-analysispdf-analysisautonomousweb-search
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentPros
- ✓Covers research from search to a cited output: paper search, Research Reports, a Systematic Review workflow that supports PRISMA 2020, and a Research Agent that produces reports, tables, figures and slides.
- ✓Searches over 138 million papers and 545,000 clinical trials, and the Research Agent adds patents, regulatory and biology databases, web sources and uploaded documents.
- ✓Publishes an MCP server and an API on Pro and above, so search, reports and systematic reviews can run inside Claude, ChatGPT and other MCP clients.
- ✓Publishes a SOC 2 Type 2 report on its trust center, and its customer page shows 41 organizations, including NASA, NIH, Harvard, Takeda and Unilever.
Limitations
- ⚠Usage is a single monthly pool that does not roll over, and larger Research Agent sessions and reviews, figure extraction and premium PDF parsing use more of it.
- ⚠The API and MCP server start on Pro at $49 per user per month billed annually, and SSO, SAML and single-tenant deployment are on the quote-based Enterprise plan.
- ⚠Enterprise states no training on customer data by default, and the terms for the Basic, Plus, Pro and Scale plans carry no equivalent training statement.
- ⚠Designed for use in English, and Elicit states that quality in other languages varies widely and that non-English use draws down usage faster.
Technical Details
Deployment
web
Model architectureAnthropic and OpenAI models (named subprocessors for AI responses) plus custom ML models hosted on CoreWeave, over a 138M-paper corpus from Semantic Scholar, PubMed and OpenAlex
Avg setup timeNo published setup duration. The free Basic plan starts with an account sign-up, and the MCP server connects through OAuth from Claude, Claude Code or another MCP client.
Autonomous rateThe Research Agent plans and runs multi-step research across its data sources and returns cited outputs without per-step approval, and the Systematic Review workflow screens papers and extracts data against the user's criteria. Elicit publishes no autonomous completion rate, and plans bill on a monthly usage pool rather than per task.
MCPServer
Integrations
MCP ServerAPIZotero (import)Semantic ScholarPubMedOpenAlexClinicalTrials.govBrowser extension (full-text access)RIS, CSV, BIB, PDF and DOCX export
Security
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRCCPA
Similar agents
Industries
ResearchPharmaHealthcareEducationPublic Sector
Leave a review
Never displayed publicly.
Agent Stacks
See workflow stacks that feature Elicit.
Is this your tool?
Claim this listing free to get your embeddable badges, a review collection link, and the Claimed badge on your listing.
Claim listing →Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.
