AI Agent Index
ByHeather MacAvelia·Last verified Jun 18, 2026
Elicit logo

Elicit

4.7/ 5

by Elicit

MCP✓ Verified Review
Visit elicit.com

AI research assistant for systematic literature reviews across 138M papers and 545K clinical trials. MCP server, full API, SOC 2 certified. Free; Pro $49/mo annual. 5M+ researchers.

From

$49

freemium

GitHub

Stars

G2

View on G2 ↗

MCP

⚡ Yes

Compatible

Elicit is the AI research assistant purpose-built for systematic literature reviews, serving 5M+ researchers globally including teams at NASA, Stanford University, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Unilever, and B. Braun. The platform searches 138 million academic papers and 545,000 clinical trials from Semantic Scholar, PubMed, and other academic databases, then autonomously extracts structured data (methodology, sample size, findings, limitations) from each paper for cross-study comparison. Founded as a Public Benefit Corporation in Oakland, California by Andreas Stuhlmuller, Elicit is designed around the end-to-end systematic review workflow: researchers define a question, Elicit finds relevant papers, extracts key claims, synthesizes findings across studies, and generates structured reports with citations. Over 40 named enterprise and institutional customers are documented on the customer stories page, spanning biotech, pharma, government agencies, and research universities. Elicit publishes an official MCP server at elicit.com/api/mcp, enabling Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and any MCP-compatible client to access all capabilities programmatically. A full REST API provides endpoints for paper search, clinical trial search, report generation, and systematic review workflows with API access included on the Pro tier. Zotero import is available on the free tier for bibliography management. The platform integrates with Semantic Scholar and PubMed as primary data sources with additional academic databases providing supplementary coverage. Notable gap: no native integration with Mendeley, EndNote, or Overleaf for bidirectional reference sync, and no Zapier or Make connectors for workflow automation with non-research tools. Pricing was restructured in 2025/2026 around two individual tiers. Basic (Free) provides limited Research Agent access, 2 automated reports per month, unlimited search across 138M papers, unlimited paper summaries, unlimited chat with papers including full-text access, and Zotero import. Pro at $49/month ($588/year with 35% annual savings) provides extended Research Agent access, a dedicated systematic review workflow that can screen 5,000 papers, 144 reports or systematic reviews per year, API access, custom extractions from uploaded papers, explanations for AI-generated answers, multiple output templates, and 10 personalized research alerts. Enterprise pricing is custom. The previous Plus and lower-priced Pro plans referenced in older sources no longer appear on the pricing page. Elicit is designed exclusively for academic and scientific literature and cannot search the open web, company reports, news, or non-peer-reviewed sources. Perplexity AI ($20/month) provides both web and academic search for broader source coverage. ChatGPT Deep Research ($20/month) and Gemini Deep Research ($19.99/month) handle cross-domain research without the academic-only constraint. Consensus ($10/month Pro) offers a lower-cost entry point for academic search with the Consensus Meter for agreement synthesis, though without dedicated systematic review workflows. SciSpace ($12/month Premium) provides multiple specialized agents including a Biomedical Agent and PRISMA support at lower cost for researchers not needing the systematic review depth that justifies the $49/month Pro tier. The jump from 2 free reports per month to Pro at $49/month is a significant gap for researchers needing moderate but not intensive systematic review access. Elicit raised $22M in a Series A (February 2025) led by Spark Capital and Footwork at a $100M valuation, bringing total funding to $31M. SOC 2 Type II certification was achieved in October 2025 with audit reports available under NDA. The official MCP server launched at elicit.com/api/mcp for integration with Claude Desktop, Claude Code, and all MCP-compatible clients. The platform now serves 5M+ researchers (up from 400,000 at the Series A announcement), with 40+ named enterprise and institutional customers documented on the customer stories page including NASA, Stanford, Takeda, Unilever, and B. Braun. The corpus expanded to 138M papers and 545,000 clinical trials. Pricing was restructured from the earlier Plus/Pro tiered model to a Basic (Free) and Pro ($49/month) structure.

Pricing

freemium · $49

View pricing ↗

Segment

b2c

Setup

easy

Verified

Jun 18, 2026

Transparency

Public

Contract

Monthly or Annual

Data training

Not Disclosed

Autonomy

Human Optional

Capabilities

deep-researchcitationsdata-analysispdf-analysisautonomousweb-search

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Pros

  • Autonomous systematic review workflow screens 5,000 papers, extracts structured data (methodology, sample size, findings, limitations) into comparable tables, and generates cited reports without manual per-paper direction, covering the most time-intensive step in academic research in minutes rather than weeks.
  • Institutional adoption at NASA, Stanford, Takeda, Unilever, and B. Braun with 40+ named customers on the customer stories page and 5M+ total researchers provides the strongest institutional validation signal of any AI research assistant, confirming production reliability for high-stakes scientific and clinical workflows.
  • Official MCP server, full REST API, and SOC 2 Type II certification position Elicit as enterprise-ready research infrastructure: developers integrate systematic review capabilities into custom workflows via Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or any MCP-compatible client, with audit-grade security compliance.

Limitations

  • Academic literature only with no web, news, or business source coverage: researchers needing open-domain research must pair Elicit with Perplexity AI ($20/month) or ChatGPT Deep Research ($20/month) for questions extending beyond the peer-reviewed corpus.
  • Significant pricing gap between free and paid tiers: Basic provides only 2 reports per month, and Pro at $49/month ($588/year) is 4 to 5 times the cost of Consensus Pro ($10/month) or SciSpace Premium ($12/month), creating a steep entry barrier for researchers needing moderate systematic review access.
  • Virtually no public review trail despite 5M users: 1 Capterra review and 0 G2 reviews as of June 2026 means enterprise procurement teams must rely on the customer stories page and institutional logos rather than independent peer reviews for due diligence.

Technical Details

Deployment
web
Model architectureProprietary
Avg setup time< 5 minutes (web app, free tier available immediately)
Autonomous rateFully autonomous: Elicit searches 138M papers and 545K clinical trials, extracts structured data from each relevant paper, synthesizes findings across studies, and generates cited literature reviews and systematic reports without manual per-paper direction. Systematic review workflow screens up to 5,000 papers per review. Per-report pricing structures each output as an independent resolution.
MCP compatibleYes
Integrations
MCP ServerAPISemantic ScholarPubMedOpenAlexClinicalTrials.govCSV Export
Security
SOC 2 Type II

Similar agents

Rating

4.7/ 5

Editorial score

How we score this →

Score breakdown

AutCap 5 · IntDepth 5 · PriceTrans 5 · IndEvid 4 · SetupAcc 5 = 4.70

Industries

PharmaEnterpriseSaaSB2B

Leave a review

Never displayed publicly.

Agent Stacks

See workflow stacks that feature Elicit.

Compare

Related Content

Is this your tool?

Claim this listing to update your details and get a Verified badge.

Claim listing →