Clay vs Warmly (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of Clay vs Warmly: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Built from The AI Agent Index's verified listing data. Clay last verified November 8, 2026. Warmly last verified October 31, 2026.
Data sourced from The AI Agent Index
Clay
by Clay
GTM data platform with waterfall enrichment across 200+ data and AI vendors, Claygent AI research and a first-party MCP server. Free plan, paid plans from $167/mo billed annually (USD).
Warmly
by Warmly
AI revenue platform that identifies website visitors and runs inbound and outbound AI agents on buying signals. Web de-anonymization from $10,000/year, TAM Agent unpriced, sold through sales, free MCP server (USD).
Capabilities
Clay
Warmly
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentClay
Pros
- ✓Waterfall enrichment across a marketplace of 200+ data and AI vendors queries sources in sequence and stops at the first verified match, which widens coverage while holding credit cost down, and failed enrichments consume nothing.
- ✓Claygent reads any webpage and extracts the data points you specify, so a careers page yields open roles, headcount and tech-stack signals that no pre-indexed provider holds, pushed straight into your CRM in the same workflow.
- ✓A first-party MCP server lets ChatGPT, Codex and Claude call Clay Functions and reason across Audiences directly, with write rules defined by the operations team rather than by the assistant.
Limitations
- –The dual-meter model of Data Credits and Actions makes cost forecasting genuinely hard. Claygent runs and multi-provider waterfalls consume credits at variable rates, and frontier-model usage is billed on actual token consumption.
- –The platform rewards a dedicated owner. Building effective waterfall tables and Claygent prompts requires understanding data-provider coverage, API logic and prompt construction, which is a real investment for a non-technical team.
- –Data freshness depends on the underlying providers rather than on Clay, since it aggregates third-party sources rather than maintaining its own database. Phone number coverage is inconsistent across the marketplace.
Warmly
Pros
- ✓Identifies website visitors at the person and company level and acts on them in real time with AI chat, routing, alerts and retargeting.
- ✓Combines first-, second- and third-party signals, including Bombora research intent, with ICP tiering and buying-committee mapping.
- ✓A free MCP server and REST API give Claude, Cursor and other agents read-only access to identified visitors and companies.
Limitations
- –Every plan is bought through sales, starting at $10,000 a year for AI Web-Deanonymization, and the TAM Agent has no listed price.
- –Products are priced separately, so inbound plans and add-ons stack: Inbound Chat starts at $20,000 and AI Inbound Autopilot at $30,000 a year.
- –The MCP server's three tools are read-only, so outside agents can look up visitors but not act in Warmly.
Frequently asked questions
How does pricing compare between Clay vs Warmly?
Clay uses a freemium model, starting at $167 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more). Warmly uses a subscription model, starting at $833 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more).
View full Clay profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
View full Warmly profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
Related comparisons
More in this category
Related guides
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Free, every two weeks. Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email. Read past issues

