Mem0 vs Zep (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of Mem0 vs Zep: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Built from The AI Agent Index's verified listing data. Mem0 last verified September 21, 2026. Zep last verified September 9, 2026.
Data sourced from The AI Agent Index
Mem0
by Mem0 AI
Open-source memory layer for AI agents, managed or self-hosted, with Python and TypeScript SDKs and an MCP server. Free Hobby plan, Starter $19/mo, Pro $249/mo (USD).
Zep
by Zep AI
Context engineering platform for AI agents with temporal knowledge graph, MCP server, and Graph RAG. Free tier, paid from $125/month ($104/mo annual). SOC 2 Type II; HIPAA BAA on Enterprise.
Capabilities
Mem0
Zep
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentMem0
Pros
- ✓Mem0 runs as a managed platform or as Apache 2.0 open-source software, with Python and TypeScript SDKs, a CLI, a hosted MCP server and more than 20 supported vector databases.
- ✓On its managed platform Mem0 reports 92.5 on LoCoMo and 94.4 on LongMemEval for its April 2026 algorithm, using under 7,000 tokens per retrieval call.
- ✓Every plan, including the permanently free Hobby plan, allows unlimited end users, and the GitHub repository has 66.1k stars.
Limitations
- –Graph memory, Dream memory consolidation and analytics start at the $249/month Pro plan, Starter includes one project, and on-premise deployment, SSO and audit logs require Enterprise.
- –Content from Hobby plan users may be used to train Mem0's AI models, while Paid Plan data is excluded from training.
- –The Trust Center lists a SOC 2 Type 1 report and a HIPAA self-attestation, both available on request, rather than a SOC 2 Type II report.
Zep
Pros
- ✓Temporal knowledge graph automatically tracks how facts change over time. When information is updated or contradicted, Zep invalidates outdated facts while preserving historical context, making it more accurate than vector-only memory systems for complex multi-session agent workflows.
- ✓Zep publishes retrieval accuracy of 94.7% at 155ms on LoCoMo and 90.2% at 162ms on LongMemEval, its own measurements on two industry benchmarks. Single-shot retrieval avoids the slower agentic tool-call loops used by some memory systems.
- ✓Graphiti MCP server gives Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP clients persistent knowledge graph memory across sessions. Python, TypeScript, and Go SDKs with webhook support and no agent framework lock-in, backed by named enterprise customers including Samsung, Zscaler and HoneyBook.
Limitations
- –Steep pricing jump from free tier (10,000 credits per month for prototyping) to Flex at $125 per month ($104 annual) with no intermediate tier. Early-stage teams that outgrow free credit limits face a significant cost increase with no middle-ground option.
- –Credit-based pricing makes costs difficult to forecast at production scale. Episodes consume 1 credit per 350 bytes, and paid plans auto-purchase more credits whenever the balance falls below 20% - Flex adds 10,000 credits at $25, Flex Plus 40,000 at $75 - so monthly spend is not capped.
- –Self-hosted Graphiti requires Docker, FalkorDB or Neo4j, and LLM API key management. The managed Memory MCP Server removes that setup but is metered in per-account MCP seats that vary by plan, and custom OIDC and UserGroup ABAC require the Enterprise plan.
Frequently asked questions
How does pricing compare between Mem0 vs Zep?
Mem0 uses a freemium model, starting at $19 per month. Zep uses a freemium model, starting at $104 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more).
View full Mem0 profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
View full Zep profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.

