AI Agent Index

Kilo Code vs Windsurf (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Kilo Code vs Windsurf: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated July 2026.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index · Updated daily

Kilo Code logo

Kilo Code

by Kilo Code

Open-source AI coding agent for VS Code, JetBrains, CLI, Cloud, and Slack with parallel agents and 500+ models. 25.4K GitHub stars, 3M+ users. Free tier; Kilo Pass from $19/mo.

freemiumB2B
Visit Kilo Code
Windsurf logo

Windsurf

by Cognition

AI-powered IDE by Cognition (formerly Windsurf) combining local editor with cloud agent orchestration. Manage fleets of agents from one surface. Free tier; Pro $20/mo; Max $200/mo.

freemiumB2C
Visit Windsurf
Kilo Code
Windsurf
Pricing model
freemium
freemium
Starting price
$19/mo
$20/mo
Pricing transparency
public
public
Contract type
both
both
Customer segment
B2B
B2C
Deployment
cloud
desktop
Setup difficulty
easy
easy
Avg setup time
Under 5 minutes (install VS Code or JetBrains extension from marketplace, configure BYOK API key or sign up for Kilo Pass, first agent task)
Under 15 minutes (download Devin Desktop from devin.ai/desktop, sign in with Devin account, import VS Code settings)
Editorial rating
4.4 / 5
4.1 / 5
G2 rating
4.8/5 (3 reviews)
4.2/5 (34 reviews)
MCP compatible
Yes
Yes
GitHub stars
25.4K
N/A
Data training
no
yes
Human in loop
optional
optional
Security certs
None confirmed
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, CCPA

Capabilities

Kilo Code

code-generationagentic-codingautonomousidemulti-file-editingautocompleteterminal-agentbyokopen-source

Windsurf

ideagentic-codingmulti-file-editingautonomousterminal-agentcode-generation

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Kilo Code

Pros

  • Open-source MIT-licensed and model-agnostic with 500+ models: connect any provider through BYOK with no markup, or use Kilo Pass managed inference from $19 per month. {{github_stars}} GitHub stars and 3M+ users validate broad developer adoption.
  • Multi-mode architecture with parallel agents across 6+ surfaces: Architect, Code, Debug, Ask, and Orchestrator modes handle planning and execution as separate concerns with subagent delegation across concurrent git worktrees. Cloud Agents, Slack, and Code Reviewer extend beyond IDE-only workflows.
  • Trusted by engineering teams at Meta, Amazon, Airbnb, PayPal, Square, and Red Hat with $8M seed funding and Product Hunt #1 Open Source Product of the Month award. Over 40 trillion tokens processed across the platform.

Limitations

  • Enterprise governance features (SSO, granular audit logs, RBAC) are less mature than GitHub Copilot or Cursor for procurement-heavy enterprise organizations that require formal security review before deployment.
  • Setup complexity for advanced features including Memory Bank, custom modes, and MCP tool configuration has a real learning curve compared to Copilot or Cursor which require near-zero configuration for basic agentic coding.
  • Local model performance depends heavily on available hardware: expect uneven results without sufficient GPU compute for larger open-source LLMs, which limits local-first deployments on standard developer machines.

Windsurf

Pros

  • Unique bundling of interactive IDE coding with autonomous cloud agents: Devin Desktop is the only product that lets developers code interactively in a local editor while simultaneously delegating tasks to autonomous Devin Cloud sessions, combining two workflows no competitor packages together.
  • SWE 1.6 proprietary model and Cascade agentic engine provide strong multi-file editing and codebase reasoning with 40+ IDE plugins for JetBrains, Vim, Neovim, and Xcode, maintaining the broad editor ecosystem that made the original Windsurf popular.
  • Pricing at $20/month for Pro includes both Devin Desktop and Devin Cloud access: better value than running Cursor ($20/month) plus a separate autonomous agent, effectively getting two products for the price of one.

Limitations

  • Brand and product direction uncertainty: the full rebrand from Windsurf to Devin Desktop, combined with the departure of Windsurf's founding team to Google, means the long-term IDE roadmap is now driven by Cognition rather than the original team that built it.
  • Autonomous cloud sessions operate asynchronously and can take minutes to hours: developers who need immediate interactive responses for tight iteration loops will find the cloud agent layer slower than Cursor or Claude Code's real-time agentic modes.
  • G2 profile still under the legacy Windsurf name with only 34 reviews at 4.2/5: independent evidence is thinner than Cursor (2,700+ reviews) or GitHub Copilot (2,200+ reviews), making it harder for enterprise procurement teams to evaluate user sentiment at scale.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Kilo Code vs Windsurf?

See the full comparison above.

Which is best for my team — Kilo Code vs Windsurf?

How does pricing compare between Kilo Code vs Windsurf?

Kilo Code uses a freemium model, starting at $19 per month. Windsurf uses a freemium model, starting at $20 per month.

View full Kilo Code profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Windsurf profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Best Kilo Code alternatives

See all alternatives →

Best Windsurf alternatives

See all alternatives →

Related comparisons

GitHub Copilot vs WindsurfKiro vs Kilo CodeRoo Code vs Kilo CodeClaude Code vs Kilo Code

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across 330+ AI agents, verified against live vendor data every 14 days.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.