AI Agent Index

Gloat vs Lattice (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Gloat vs Lattice: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated July 30, 2026 by The AI Agent Index Editorial Team.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index

Gloat logo

Gloat

by Gloat

Agentic HR platform with pre-built AI workforce agents for talent management, succession planning, and workforce orchestration. Deploys on Workday, SuccessFactors, and Oracle HCM in weeks. Custom pricing.

customENTERPRISE
Visit Gloat
Lattice logo

Lattice

by Lattice

People management platform with AI for performance, OKRs, engagement and compensation, plus a first-party MCP server. Engagement from $4 seat/month, Foundations $13, billed annually in USD.

subscriptionB2B
Visit Lattice
Gloat
Lattice
Pricing model
custom
subscription
Starting price
Contact sales
$4/mo, billed annually
Pricing transparency
quote only
mostly public
Contract type
annual only
annual only
Customer segment
ENTERPRISE
B2B
Deployment
cloud
cloud, web
Setup difficulty
moderate
easy
Avg setup time
2-6 weeks depending on HCM platform and organizational complexity
Editorial rating
4.5 / 5
4.2 / 5
G2 rating
4.4/5 (34 reviews)
4.6/5 (4,116 reviews)
MCP
No
Server
GitHub stars
N/A
N/A
Data training
no
no
Human in loop
optional
required
Security certs
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR
GDPR, CCPA

Capabilities

Gloat

autonomousworkflow-builderdata-analysisreportingforecastingpersonalization

Lattice

reportingdata-analysisforecastingworkflow-builder

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Gloat

Pros

  • Deepest HCM integration in the HR agent category: native bidirectional sync with Workday, SAP SuccessFactors, and Oracle HCM that ingests data, business logic, workflows, and configurations rather than surface-level API connections, with Microsoft Teams and Copilot integration for in-context agent deployment.
  • Autonomous orchestration of complex HR workflows at enterprise scale: agents run performance review cycles for hundreds of employees across multiple stages, infer and map skills from resumes and work history, detect retention risk, and surface succession readiness without per-action human approval.
  • $192M+ in funding from Generation Investment Management, Accel, Intel Capital, and Eight Roads Ventures with named Fortune 500 customers including Unilever, Schneider Electric, Mastercard, PepsiCo, and Standard Chartered Bank across approximately 900 organizations.

Limitations

  • Custom pricing with no published tiers, no self-serve trial, and no monthly billing: enterprise buyers must engage sales for a quote based on employee count and scope, increasing evaluation friction compared to HR tools with transparent pricing.
  • Requires Workday, SuccessFactors, or Oracle HCM as the underlying system of record: organizations on smaller or less common HRIS platforms will not get the full value of Gloat's deep bidirectional integration, and companies without an enterprise HCM in place would need to implement one first.
  • No MCP support and limited extensibility beyond the HR ecosystem: unlike platforms with broad integration marketplaces, Gloat's integration depth is focused specifically on HCM and collaboration tools, with no native connections to CRM, support, or data warehouse systems outside the HR domain.

Lattice

Pros

  • First-party MCP server published 7 July 2026, with setup guides for Claude, ChatGPT and Slack, that lets external AI assistants draft, edit and submit performance reviews while inheriting each user's existing Lattice permissions rather than widening access.
  • Modular published pricing in USD from $4 seat/month for Engagement, $8 for Goals and OKRs, $10 for Performance and $13 for the Foundations bundle, with Analytics, AI Agent and Integrations included in every base product.
  • 25 native integrations spanning HRIS, identity and work tooling, including Workday, ADP, Rippling, BambooHR, Gusto, UKG, Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, Slack, Jira and Salesforce, so companies can adopt Lattice for talent management without replacing an existing system of record.

Limitations

  • Annual billing only with a $4,000 minimum annual agreement, so the advertised $4 seat/month Engagement rate is not reachable as a small month-to-month purchase.
  • No self-serve purchase and no free trial at any tier: every plan card routes to a demo or a custom quote, and the Enterprise tier is priced only on request.
  • Lattice no longer sells a priced HRIS product, so buyers needing payroll, benefits administration or a system of record still require a separate platform alongside it.

Frequently asked questions

How does pricing compare between Gloat vs Lattice?

Gloat uses a custom model with pricing on request. Lattice uses a subscription model, starting at $4 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more).

View full Gloat profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Lattice profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Related comparisons

Leapsome vs Lattice

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.