Gloat vs Lattice (2026)

Gloat

by Gloat

Lattice

by Lattice

Pros

• ✓Native integration with Workday HCM, SAP SuccessFactors and Oracle HCM that reads business logic and approval chains, with agents that write back.
• ✓Pre-built HR agents, customizable on a visual canvas or in plain language, with field-level permissions and an audit trail for each decision.
• ✓Fosway 9-Grid Strategic Leader for Talent and People Success, with published customer stories from Schneider Electric, PepsiCo and Mastercard.

Limitations

• –Custom pricing with no published price list. Buying runs through a demo, and the no-cost Agentic HR Program is limited to selected organizations per cohort.
• –Built for organizations running Workday, SAP SuccessFactors or Oracle HCM as the system of record.
• –Gloat states integration plus agent configuration takes about 6 to 11 weeks on Workday, with most customers live on a first agent within 90 days, and no MCP server is published.

Pros

• ✓First-party MCP server for US and EU data residency, with setup guides for Claude, ChatGPT and Slack, that lets AI assistants draft and submit reviews within each user's existing permissions.
• ✓Modular published pricing in USD: Engagement $4, Goals and OKRs $8, Performance $10 and the Foundations bundle $13 per seat per month, with Analytics, AI Agent and Integrations in every base product.
• ✓26 native integrations across HRIS, identity, work tools and MCP, including Workday, ADP, Rippling, Gusto, Okta, Slack, Jira and Glean.

Limitations

• –Annual billing only with a $4,000 minimum annual agreement, so the advertised $4 seat/month Engagement rate is not available as a small month-to-month purchase.
• –No self-serve purchase and no free trial at any tier: every plan card routes to a demo or a custom quote, and the Enterprise tier is priced only on request.
• –Lattice no longer sells a priced HRIS product, so buyers needing payroll, benefits administration or a system of record run a separate platform alongside it.