Factory AI vs Devin (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of Factory AI vs Devin: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated July 14, 2026 by The AI Agent Index Editorial Team.
Data sourced from The AI Agent Index
Factory AI and Devin are the two leading autonomous coding agent platforms, and both charge the same entry price. The decision usually turns on two things neither vendor puts side by side: whether you can try it before paying, and whether the vendor trains its models on your code. Factory AI is an agent-native platform built around Droids, autonomous agents that run across Desktop, CLI, and SDK surfaces. There is no free tier. Pro is the minimum entry at $20/mo, then Plus at $100 and Max at $200 for roughly 5x and 10x the usage. Every individual plan is metered by rolling rate limits across 5-hour, weekly, and monthly windows. When Standard Usage runs out, Droid Core offers open-weight models at no additional cost, and Extra Usage sells prepaid credits from a $10 minimum. Factory Missions, the flagship autonomous workflow, will not run at all unless Extra Usage is enabled. Factory publishes SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, and CCPA on a public trust center, and guarantees in writing that customer code is never used to train Factory models or the models of its providers. Factory connects out to MCP servers but does not publish one. Devin is Cognition's autonomous software engineer. It plans, codes, tests, and opens pull requests from a Slack message or a GitHub issue. Unlike Factory, Devin has a real free plan: a light quota, limited models, and unlimited inline edits. Pro matches Factory at $20/mo, Max is $200, and Teams is $80 per month plus $40 per developer seat. SWE 1.7 runs on every tier including the free one. Devin publishes an MCP server that external AI agents connect into, and it also acts as a client. Cognition holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and CCPA. Its platform terms state that Cognition may use customer data for model training, and that the opt-out is available only to paid subscribers. The free plan therefore cannot opt out at all. **Choose Factory AI when** the data terms matter more than the trial. A written no-training guarantee on every tier, ISO 42001, and Zero Data Retention on Business and Enterprise are procurement-grade commitments that Devin does not match. **Choose Devin when** you want to evaluate before paying, or you want the agent itself reachable by other AI tools. The free plan is genuine, and the published MCP server is a capability Factory does not offer. Accept that Cognition trains on customer data by default, and that only paid tiers can switch it off. Teams evaluating either should also compare Claude Code for terminal-native agentic coding and GitHub Copilot for the broadest enterprise ecosystem.
Factory AI
by Factory
Agent-native software development platform with Droids autonomous agents and full SDLC automation pipeline. $220M raised at $1.5B valuation. Pro $20/mo; Plus $100/mo; Max $200/mo.
Best for
Teams where the data terms decide the purchase. A written no-training guarantee on every tier, ISO 42001, and Zero Data Retention on Business and Enterprise, from $20/mo, with no free tier to evaluate first.
Devin
by Cognition
Fully autonomous AI software engineer that plans, codes, tests, and submits pull requests. Free tier; Pro $20/mo; Max $200/mo; Teams $80/mo + $40/seat. SOC 2, ISO 27001.
Best for
Teams that want to evaluate before paying, and that want the agent itself reachable by other AI tools. A genuine free plan and a published MCP server, from $20/mo, accepting that Cognition trains on customer data by default.
Capabilities
Factory AI
Devin
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentFactory AI
Pros
- ✓Number one on Terminal Bench with multi-surface Droid architecture: agents accessible from Desktop, CLI, and SDK lets developers orchestrate autonomous workflows across whatever tooling they already use, more flexible than single-surface tools like Cursor or Devin Desktop.
- ✓Droid Computers on Plus and Max tiers provide Factory-managed cloud sandboxes for autonomous agent tasks, letting Droids run without consuming local compute or affecting active workspaces. SDK enables programmatic embedding of Droids into custom tooling and CI/CD pipelines.
- ✓Enterprise-grade security verified on a public Trust Center: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, and CCPA, plus an explicit written guarantee that customer code is never used to train Factory's models or its providers'' models. Zero Data Retention on Business and Enterprise, with on-premise deployment, encryption keys, data residency, and network policy controls.
Limitations
- ⚠No free tier creates evaluation friction: Pro at $20/month is accessible but requires payment before evaluation, unlike Cursor, Cline, or Claude Code which all offer free tiers for individual developers to test before committing.
- ⚠Limited third-party review evidence despite strong enterprise adoption: only 2 G2 reviews and 3 Product Hunt reviews, making independent quality assessment difficult for procurement teams that rely on peer review platforms alongside vendor references.
- ⚠Plus at $100/month and Max at $200/month are meaningful pricing jumps: power users running heavy autonomous workflows pay 5x to 10x the Pro price, which requires upfront budget planning despite the enterprise customer validation.
Devin
Pros
- ✓Highest autonomous execution capability among coding agents: Cognition reports approximately 75% task completion on well-defined engineering tasks, handling the full loop from planning through implementation to pull request submission without developer supervision. Nubank documented 8 to 12x engineering efficiency gains on a multi-million line migration.
- ✓Devin Desktop (formerly Windsurf) IDE usage now bundled with all paid plans: Pro at $20/month includes both autonomous Devin Cloud sessions and Devin Desktop agentic coding, combining two distinct modes of AI-assisted development under a single subscription with no equivalent from Cursor, Claude Code, or GitHub Copilot.
- ✓Native Slack, Linear, and GitHub integrations on Pro tier: engineering teams can assign tasks directly from their existing workflow tools and receive status updates without context-switching to a separate interface. Devin also publishes an official MCP server that external AI agents connect into and consumes external MCP servers as a client.
Limitations
- ⚠Asynchronous operation creates a slow feedback loop: Devin tasks take minutes to hours rather than the near-instant responses developers expect from Cursor or Claude Code, making it unsuitable for tight iteration, debugging sessions, or pair programming workflows where real-time interaction matters.
- ⚠Performance degrades on ambiguous and open-ended requirements: Devin excels on bounded, well-specified tasks with clear success criteria, but the 25% failure rate rises significantly on open-ended feature development, unusual codebases, or tasks requiring architectural judgment that benefits from human context.
- ⚠Pay-as-you-go billing past quota creates cost unpredictability: Pro at $20/month includes a usage quota that can be exceeded on complex multi-step tasks, with additional usage billed at API pricing rates, making monthly spend difficult to predict for teams running multiple concurrent autonomous sessions.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Factory AI vs Devin?
Factory AI and Devin are the two leading autonomous coding agent platforms, and both charge the same entry price. The decision usually turns on two things neither vendor puts side by side: whether you can try it before paying, and whether the vendor trains its models on your code. Factory AI is an agent-native platform built around Droids, autonomous agents that run across Desktop, CLI, and SDK surfaces. There is no free tier. Pro is the minimum entry at $20/mo, then Plus at $100 and Max at $200 for roughly 5x and 10x the usage. Every individual plan is metered by rolling rate limits across 5-hour, weekly, and monthly windows. When Standard Usage runs out, Droid Core offers open-weight models at no additional cost, and Extra Usage sells prepaid credits from a $10 minimum. Factory Missions, the flagship autonomous workflow, will not run at all unless Extra Usage is enabled. Factory publishes SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, and CCPA on a public trust center, and guarantees in writing that customer code is never used to train Factory models or the models of its providers. Factory connects out to MCP servers but does not publish one. Devin is Cognition's autonomous software engineer. It plans, codes, tests, and opens pull requests from a Slack message or a GitHub issue. Unlike Factory, Devin has a real free plan: a light quota, limited models, and unlimited inline edits. Pro matches Factory at $20/mo, Max is $200, and Teams is $80 per month plus $40 per developer seat. SWE 1.7 runs on every tier including the free one. Devin publishes an MCP server that external AI agents connect into, and it also acts as a client. Cognition holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and CCPA. Its platform terms state that Cognition may use customer data for model training, and that the opt-out is available only to paid subscribers. The free plan therefore cannot opt out at all. **Choose Factory AI when** the data terms matter more than the trial. A written no-training guarantee on every tier, ISO 42001, and Zero Data Retention on Business and Enterprise are procurement-grade commitments that Devin does not match. **Choose Devin when** you want to evaluate before paying, or you want the agent itself reachable by other AI tools. The free plan is genuine, and the published MCP server is a capability Factory does not offer. Accept that Cognition trains on customer data by default, and that only paid tiers can switch it off. Teams evaluating either should also compare Claude Code for terminal-native agentic coding and GitHub Copilot for the broadest enterprise ecosystem.
Which is best for my team: Factory AI vs Devin?
Factory AI is best for: Teams where the data terms decide the purchase. A written no-training guarantee on every tier, ISO 42001, and Zero Data Retention on Business and Enterprise, from $20/mo, with no free tier to evaluate first.. Devin is best for: Teams that want to evaluate before paying, and that want the agent itself reachable by other AI tools. A genuine free plan and a published MCP server, from $20/mo, accepting that Cognition trains on customer data by default..
How does pricing compare between Factory AI vs Devin?
Factory AI uses a subscription model, starting at $20 per month. Devin uses a freemium model, starting at $20 per month.
View full Factory AI profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
View full Devin profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
Related comparisons
Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across 344+ AI agents. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.