Independently verified against live vendor data on Sep 10, 2026.
Pricing
custom
Segment
Enterprise
Setup
complex
Verified
Sep 10, 2026
Transparency
Quote Only
Contract
Annual Only
Data training
Not Trained
Human in loop
Optional
Capabilities
deep-researchdata-analysiscitationsautonomous
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentPros
- ✓Harvey Agents execute complex legal work end to end: from contract analysis and due diligence through drafting and research, agents plan the work, split large tasks across parallel agents, and return cited, review-ready output without step-by-step attorney direction. Scheduled Agents can also run recurring work in the background.
- ✓Deep enterprise adoption and backing: Harvey states that more than 200,000 professionals at over 2,400 law firms and in-house legal teams use it, named clients include Dentons, KKR, Bridgewater, PwC, Deutsche Telekom, and Procter and Gamble, and it raised $550M at a $15.5B valuation in September 2026.
- ✓Works where legal teams already work: iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, Google Drive and Box connections, Word and Outlook add-ins, LexisNexis research content, and MCP in both directions, with a first-party MCP server for outside assistants and MCP connectors that pull in PitchBook, Datasite and SS&C Intralinks data.
Limitations
- –Enterprise-only pricing with no public price list and no self-serve plan, so every deployment starts with a sales conversation and buyers cannot compare cost before a demo. Spellbook and CoCounsel ($360/mo billed annually) are the closest alternatives for teams that want to compare.
- –Harvey publishes no setup or implementation timeline and offers no self-serve trial, so firms cannot switch it on and evaluate it on their own before engaging Harvey sales. Its MCP connectors to outside tools launched in early access, and Harvey describes MCP governance as a shared responsibility with the firm admins who choose which tool actions are permitted.
- –Independent review volume is small relative to adoption: the G2 and Gartner Peer Insights corpora each hold well under fifty reviews despite more than 200,000 professionals using the platform, so procurement teams relying on review sites will find thin public evidence.
Technical Details
Deployment
webapi
Model architectureProprietary (multi-model, custom-trained on legal corpora)
Avg setup timeNot published. Harvey states no setup or implementation timeline, and deployment is sales-led with no self-serve trial.
Autonomous rateHarvey Agents plan and execute legal work end to end, split large tasks across parallel agents, and return cited, review-ready output, while Scheduled Agents run recurring work in the background. Attorneys review the finished output rather than approving each step. Harvey publishes no production autonomous completion rate. Its Legal Agent Benchmark reports rubric pass rates on held-out research tasks, which measure model performance rather than resolution of customer work.
Integrations
Microsoft 365iManageNetDocumentsSharePointOneDriveGoogle DriveGmailBoxLexisNexisPitchBookDatasiteSS&C IntralinksAderantIntapp
Security
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001ISO 42001GDPRCCPA
Similar agents
Industries
Legal
Built for
EnterpriseB2B
Leave a review
Never displayed publicly.
Agent Stacks
See workflow stacks that feature Harvey AI.
Related Content
Alternatives
Best Harvey AI Alternatives in 2026→Is this your tool?
Claim this listing free to get your embeddable badges, a review collection link, and the Claimed badge on your listing.
Claim listing →Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.
