Adapt vs Tines (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of Adapt vs Tines: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Built from The AI Agent Index's verified listing data. Adapt last verified October 6, 2026. Tines last verified September 21, 2026.
Data sourced from The AI Agent Index
Adapt
by Adapt
Company agent platform: build agents on shared company knowledge, connect tools via API, MCP or CLI, and use them in Slack, web, email or iMessage. Managed from $14/user/mo plus usage.
Tines
by Tines
Tines Stories, the no-code intelligent workflow platform for security, IT and operations: AI agents, MCP server and client, cases and pages. Free Community Edition, paid editions quote-only.
Capabilities
Adapt
Tines
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentAdapt
Pros
- ✓Works where teams already are: Slack (including a Slack app under the customer's own name and icon), the web app, a Chrome extension that can take browser actions, email, and iMessage or RCS texting.
- ✓A hosted MCP server (beta) with OAuth sign-in lets Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code and other MCP clients run an Adapt agent with full company context, and models can run on the customer's own keys at no markup.
- ✓SOC 2 Type II certified, with a stated commitment that customer data is never used to train AI models, an optional zero data retention mode on Managed, and natural-language policies that can require approval before named actions.
Limitations
- –Microsoft Teams is not listed among Adapt's surfaces or integrations, so organizations that do not use Slack rely on the web app, browser extension, email or text messaging, and Adapt's security page still marks granular role-based permissions as coming soon.
- –Managed pricing combines a per-user fee with metered sandbox compute, storage, memory and gateway model usage, which is harder to forecast than a flat subscription, and there is no free hosted tier.
- –The open-source edition is offered through a waitlist rather than as a public repository, and independent reviews are limited to a small number on G2.
Tines
Pros
- ✓An MCP server on every plan, including Community Edition, exposes workflows to AI clients, and the AI Agent action can also call tools on external MCP servers.
- ✓Language models run by default on Tines-hosted AWS Bedrock infrastructure in the tenant's region, with no training on customer data.
- ✓SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023 for AI management are listed in its public Trust Center.
Limitations
- –Business and Enterprise editions publish no rates, so pricing above the free Community Edition requires a sales conversation.
- –Community Edition is capped at three flows, and each MCP server with connected tools counts as one of them.
- –Cases, Advanced Workflows such as Records and Dashboards, and self-hosting are available only on paid editions.
Frequently asked questions
How does pricing compare between Adapt vs Tines?
Adapt uses a subscription model, starting at $14 per month. Tines uses a freemium model with pricing on request.
View full Adapt profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
View full Tines profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.