AI Agent Index

Tines vs Adapt (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Tines vs Adapt: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated July 13, 2026 by The AI Agent Index Editorial Team.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index

Tines logo

Tines

by Tines

No-code intelligent workflow platform for security, IT and operations: AI agents, copilots, case management, and app building. Free Community Edition; enterprise custom. $272M raised, $1.125B valuation.

freemiumENTERPRISE
Visit Tines
Adapt logo

Adapt

by Adapt

Universal AI agent for work: ask questions across connected systems, automate workflows, and build internal apps from Slack or web. Free starter with $25 credits, Pro from $50/mo. SOC 2 Type II.

freemiumB2B
Visit Adapt
Tines
Adapt
Pricing model
freemium
freemium
Starting price
Contact sales
$50/mo
Pricing transparency
partial
public
Contract type
both
monthly
Customer segment
ENTERPRISE
B2B
Deployment
web, api, cloud, self-hosted
web, slack
Setup difficulty
moderate
easy
Avg setup time
1-5 days for first workflow (no-code builder, pre-built templates available)
Under 1 hour
Editorial rating
4.5 / 5
3.5 / 5
G2 rating
4.7/5 (400 reviews)
No G2 listing
MCP
Yes
No
GitHub stars
N/A
N/A
Data training
not disclosed
no
Human in loop
optional
optional
Security certs
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, CCPA
SOC 2 Type II

Capabilities

Tines

workflow-builderautonomousno-codeagentic-codingreportingscheduling

Adapt

workflow-builderdata-analysisreportingschedulingcrm-syncautonomousno-code

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Tines

Pros

  • Full-spectrum automation in one platform: teams choose between human-led, deterministic, and agentic workflow modes per workflow, with native agent building, Workbench AI copilot, and Cases for incident management all integrated without switching tools
  • No-code drag-and-drop interface that handles mission-critical workflows: security teams with no engineering background build complex incident response automations using Story Copilot (natural language builder launched February 2026), plus Pages and Build Apps for custom internal applications on top of workflows
  • MCP server support available on all plans including the free Community Edition: build and deploy custom remote MCP servers directly on the Storyboard and connect to Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, or any MCP-compatible client in minutes

Limitations

  • Custom pricing only above the Community and Starter tiers: no published rates require a sales conversation, making budget planning and comparison against Zapier ($16/month) or n8n (free self-hosted) difficult without entering a commercial discussion
  • Security-first heritage means the platform is most mature for SecOps and ITOps workflows: teams in marketing, sales, or product may find less community content and fewer pre-built workflow templates for their use cases versus Zapier or Make
  • Free Community Edition has meaningful feature limits (1 builder, 3 flows): teams that outgrow it move to Starter Edition (self-serve, pricing not publicly published) or Enterprise (custom), with no transparent intermediate pricing between free and enterprise

Adapt

Pros

  • Usage-based pricing with no seat minimums and a genuinely free starter tier eliminates adoption friction: Starter gives every user $25 in free credits plus a $100 Slack bonus and up to $300 for work domain signups, meaning teams can run real workflows at scale before committing to any paid plan
  • Slack-native interaction model means zero new tool adoption required from end users: any team member can tag @Adapt in any existing Slack channel to query data, trigger workflows, or get cross-system analysis without learning a new interface, attending training, or switching context
  • SOC 2 Type II certified with explicit confirmation that user data is never used to train AI models, with OAuth tokens and API keys stored in enterprise-grade encrypted infrastructure, directly addressing the data privacy objections that block AI workflow tool adoption in security-conscious organizations

Limitations

  • Microsoft Teams is not supported: organizations where Slack is not the primary communication platform must use the web app for all interactions, reducing the seamless chat-native experience that is central to Adapt's core value proposition
  • Zero independent reviews on G2, Capterra, or any third-party platform as of Q2 2026: prospective buyers have no external validation beyond vendor-published customer testimonials, making it difficult to assess real-world reliability and support quality before committing
  • Credit-based pricing makes costs difficult to forecast at production scale: teams running complex cross-system workflows may find usage-based billing less predictable than flat-rate alternatives like Zapier (from $19.99/month) or Make (from $9/month) that offer fixed monthly pricing

Frequently asked questions

How does pricing compare between Tines vs Adapt?

Tines uses a freemium model with pricing on request. Adapt uses a freemium model, starting at $50 per month.

View full Tines profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Adapt profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Best Tines alternatives

See all alternatives →

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across 344+ AI agents. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.