Runbear vs Tines (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of Runbear vs Tines: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated August 8, 2026 by The AI Agent Index Editorial Team.
Data sourced from The AI Agent Index
Runbear
by Runbear, Inc.
Shared AI teammates in Slack, Teams, Discord, HubSpot and Zendesk that answer from connected team knowledge and act across 2,500+ tools. Exposes its own MCP server. From $79/mo billed yearly (USD), 14-day free trial.
Tines
by Tines
Intelligent workflow platform for security, IT and operations: AI agents, MCP server, case management and app building. Free edition with 3 workflows, paid editions quote-only.
Capabilities
Runbear
Tines
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentRunbear
Pros
- ✓Works in both MCP directions, acting as a client from Slack and exposing its own hosted MCP server for Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Windsurf and Zed.
- ✓Credit-based pricing with no per-seat charge, so cost tracks usage rather than headcount, and both published tiers list their exact credit allowance.
- ✓Per-user authorization on shared agents plus a SIEM-exportable audit log, and the vendor states plainly that customer data is not used for model training.
Limitations
- ⚠The MCP server is in early access with an expanding tool set, and the vendor states some agent settings remain dashboard-only.
- ⚠The vendor publishes two different integration counts, 2,500+ on its integrations page and 2,000+ in its llms.txt and its own submission, and we could not establish which is current.
- ⚠Independent evidence is thin at one G2 review and seven Product Hunt reviews, with no Capterra or Trustpilot presence, and the SOC 2 Type II report is gated behind a trust center access request.
Tines
Pros
- ✓Three workflow modes in one environment: human-led for judgment calls, deterministic for compliance and triage, and agentic for autonomous action, so teams can automate mission-critical work without committing entirely to autonomous AI.
- ✓Publishes an MCP server on every edition including the free one, exposing any API or workflow to Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline and other MCP clients, with four access control modes.
- ✓ISO/IEC 42001:2023 certified for AI management alongside SOC 2 Type 2 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022, all verified in an ungated Trust Center, which few workflow platforms can show.
Limitations
- ⚠No published rates above the free edition: Business and Enterprise are both quote-only, so budgeting or comparing against Zapier or Make requires entering a sales conversation first.
- ⚠The free edition is capped at three live workflows and MCP server builds count against that limit, so a single MCP build consumes a third of the free allowance.
- ⚠The platform is most mature for SecOps and ITOps, and teams in marketing, sales, or product will find fewer pre-built templates than on Zapier or Make.
Frequently asked questions
How does pricing compare between Runbear vs Tines?
Runbear uses a subscription model, starting at $79 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more). Tines uses a freemium model with pricing on request.
View full Runbear profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
View full Tines profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.

