AI Agent Index

n8n vs Adapt (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of n8n vs Adapt: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Built from The AI Agent Index's verified listing data. n8n last verified July 26, 2026. Adapt last verified July 27, 2026.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index

n8n logo

n8n

by n8n GmbH

Open-source workflow automation platform with 400+ integrations, 70+ AI agent nodes, and MCP support. Visual editor plus inline code. Self-hosted free; cloud from EUR 20/mo.

freemiumB2B
Visit n8n
Adapt logo

Adapt

by Adapt

Universal AI agent for work: ask questions across connected systems, automate workflows, and build internal apps from Slack, web, or mobile. Free starter with $25 credits, Pro from $50/mo. SOC 2 Type II.

freemiumB2B
Visit Adapt
n8n
Adapt
Pricing model
freemium
freemium
Starting price
EUR 20/mo, billed annually
$50/mo
Pricing transparency
mostly public
mostly public
Contract type
both
monthly
Customer segment
B2B
B2B
Deployment
cloud, self-hosted
web, slack, mobile
Setup difficulty
moderate
easy
Avg setup time
< 1 hour for self-hosted (Docker deploy, configure first workflow); < 15 minutes for n8n Cloud (sign up, connect first integration)
Under 1 hour
Editorial rating
4.6 / 5
On Our Radar
G2 rating
4.7/5 (294 reviews)
No G2 listing
MCP
Server + client
Server
GitHub stars
203k
N/A
Data training
no
no
Human in loop
optional
optional
Security certs
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA
SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA

Capabilities

n8n

workflow-builderno-codeopen-sourcedata-analysiscrm-syncautonomous

Adapt

workflow-builderdata-analysisreportingschedulingcrm-syncautonomousno-code

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

n8n

Pros

  • Open-source with self-hosting option that gives technical teams full data control, no per-task pricing, and no vendor lock-in: self-hosted deployments run unlimited workflows and executions at zero cost.
  • 70+ AI agent nodes built natively into the platform using LangChain: AI Agent node can call any other n8n node as a tool, enabling autonomous workflows that query APIs, update CRMs, send emails, and generate reports without custom code.
  • Inline JavaScript and Python code execution lets developers handle complex data transformations, iteration logic, and API manipulation that no-code platforms cannot replicate without workarounds.

Limitations

  • Self-hosted deployment requires server setup, Docker knowledge, and ongoing maintenance: not suitable for non-technical teams who should evaluate Zapier or Make.com instead.
  • Smaller native app library than Zapier at 400+ integrations: most gaps are covered by the HTTP Request node for developers, but non-developers will find fewer one-click connectors.
  • Cloud plan pricing is higher per execution than Make.com for teams that do not need self-hosting, and the learning curve is steeper than both Zapier and Make for users without automation experience.

Adapt

Pros

  • Usage-based pricing with no seat minimums and a genuinely free starter tier lowers adoption friction. Starter gives every user $25 in free credits, a $100 Slack bonus, and up to $300 for work-domain signups, so teams can run real workflows before committing to a paid plan.
  • Slack-native interaction means end users adopt nothing new: anyone can tag @Adapt in an existing channel to query data, trigger workflows, or run cross-system analysis. Adapt also exposes a hosted MCP server (early access, June 2026), so external agents and tools can connect over the Model Context Protocol and inherit full company context.
  • SOC 2 Type II certified, with GDPR and CCPA listed on the security page and an explicit commitment that user data is never used to train AI models. OAuth tokens and API keys are stored in encrypted infrastructure, addressing the privacy objections that block AI tool adoption.

Limitations

  • Microsoft Teams is not supported, so organizations where Slack is not the primary chat platform must rely on the web or mobile app for all interactions, reducing the chat-native experience central to Adapt's value.
  • Zero independent reviews on G2, Capterra, or any third-party platform as of Q3 2026, so buyers have no external validation beyond vendor-published testimonials to assess reliability and support before committing.
  • Credit-based pricing is harder to forecast at production scale than flat-rate billing, so teams running complex cross-system workflows may find costs less predictable than no-code alternatives such as Zapier or Make ($9/mo billed annually).

Frequently asked questions

How does pricing compare between n8n vs Adapt?

n8n uses a freemium model, starting at EUR 20 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more). Adapt uses a freemium model, starting at $50 per month.

View full n8n profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Adapt profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Best n8n alternatives

See all alternatives →

Related comparisons

n8n vs Zapier

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.