kapa.ai vs Zep (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of kapa.ai vs Zep: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Built from The AI Agent Index's verified listing data. kapa.ai last verified September 25, 2026. Zep last verified September 9, 2026.
Data sourced from The AI Agent Index
kapa.ai
by kapa.ai, Inc.
kapa.ai turns technical docs, code, tickets and community threads into cited answers for AI agents through a retrieval API, a hosted MCP server and pre-built agents. 14-day free trial, then quote-only plans.
Zep
by Zep AI
Context engineering platform for AI agents with temporal knowledge graph, MCP server, and Graph RAG. Free tier, paid from $125/month ($104/mo annual). SOC 2 Type II; HIPAA BAA on Enterprise.
Capabilities
kapa.ai
Zep
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentkapa.ai
Pros
- ✓Every generated answer carries inline citations to the customer's own sources, and it is designed to say it does not know when those sources do not cover a question.
- ✓One knowledge base serves the Retrieval API, a hosted MCP server and pre-built agents for a website widget, Slack, Discord, a support form, Zendesk and in-product use.
- ✓Ingests more than 20 source types, from documentation sites, GitHub and OpenAPI specs to Zendesk tickets, Confluence and Notion, with continuous sync on paid plans.
Limitations
- –Growth and Enterprise are quote-only, commercial plans carry a minimum annual commitment, and there is no self-serve card signup.
- –Private sources, continuous sync, zero data retention and PII masking start on Growth, and SSO, SCIM, role-based access control and EU hosting are Enterprise features.
- –The hosted MCP search tool returns results in about 3 seconds at the median and 4.5 seconds at the 95th percentile, and public OAuth servers allow 600 searches per user per day.
Zep
Pros
- ✓Temporal knowledge graph automatically tracks how facts change over time. When information is updated or contradicted, Zep invalidates outdated facts while preserving historical context, making it more accurate than vector-only memory systems for complex multi-session agent workflows.
- ✓Zep publishes retrieval accuracy of 94.7% at 155ms on LoCoMo and 90.2% at 162ms on LongMemEval, its own measurements on two industry benchmarks. Single-shot retrieval avoids the slower agentic tool-call loops used by some memory systems.
- ✓Graphiti MCP server gives Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP clients persistent knowledge graph memory across sessions. Python, TypeScript, and Go SDKs with webhook support and no agent framework lock-in, backed by named enterprise customers including Samsung, Zscaler and HoneyBook.
Limitations
- –Steep pricing jump from free tier (10,000 credits per month for prototyping) to Flex at $125 per month ($104 annual) with no intermediate tier. Early-stage teams that outgrow free credit limits face a significant cost increase with no middle-ground option.
- –Credit-based pricing makes costs difficult to forecast at production scale. Episodes consume 1 credit per 350 bytes, and paid plans auto-purchase more credits whenever the balance falls below 20% - Flex adds 10,000 credits at $25, Flex Plus 40,000 at $75 - so monthly spend is not capped.
- –Self-hosted Graphiti requires Docker, FalkorDB or Neo4j, and LLM API key management. The managed Memory MCP Server removes that setup but is metered in per-account MCP seats that vary by plan, and custom OIDC and UserGroup ABAC require the Enterprise plan.
Frequently asked questions
How does pricing compare between kapa.ai vs Zep?
kapa.ai uses a usage-based model with pricing on request. Zep uses a freemium model, starting at $104 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more).
View full kapa.ai profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
View full Zep profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.

