Crush vs Mindra (2026)

Crush

by Crush, UAB

Mindra

by Mindra

Pros

• ✓Launches Meta campaigns and moves budget to winning ads with no per-action approval, with a hands-off Autopilot mode and anti-burn funnel protection.
• ✓Every price is published and self-serve, from a $19.95 two-week entry plan to $79.95 a month, with the credit cost of each image and video ad stated.
• ✓A free ad library, rebuilt nightly, indexes millions of Facebook and Instagram ads with how long each ran, open without a paid plan.

Limitations

• –Paid advertising runs on Meta only (Facebook and Instagram), with organic posting to TikTok and YouTube but no paid campaigns there.
• –The $29.95 shown with per-month wording buys a four-week entry plan, after which the plan renews at $79.95 a month, and Autopilot adds 5% of managed ad spend.
• –The 14-day money-back guarantee covers only the first plan payment, and Autopilot fees and credit packs are not refundable.

Pros

• ✓Scores every campaign on revenue that reached the store, using Shopify, Stripe, GA4 and attribution tools, rather than on the conversions each ad platform claims.
• ✓Covers ten ad platforms, from Google, Meta and TikTok to Amazon Ads, Apple Search Ads and Microsoft Ads, and moves budget across them from one daily plan.
• ✓A single published fee of 5% of managed ad spend with no tiers or seats, and nothing moves until the team approves it.

Limitations

• –The fee scales with the ad spend Mindra manages, and the company says it is built for brands spending from around $30k a month, so it is not aimed at small advertisers.
• –By default every budget move waits for approval, and automatic moves inside set limits are described only for enterprise engagements.
• –Repositioned around ecommerce ad budgets in 2026, with no reviews yet on G2, Capterra, Trustpilot or Product Hunt, and its trust center names no SOC 2 auditor.