Auto-Respond vs Qualified (2026)
Side-by-side comparison of Auto-Respond vs Qualified: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Built from The AI Agent Index's verified listing data. Auto-Respond last verified October 20, 2026. Qualified last verified October 4, 2026.
Data sourced from The AI Agent Index
Auto-Respond
by NZ Leads Inc.
Auto-Respond replies to home service leads from Yelp, Thumbtack, Facebook, Instagram and Google Local Services Ads in under 2 seconds, then books the job or calls back. From $19 per month (USD) per source.
Qualified
by Salesforce
Agentic marketing platform built on Piper, the AI SDR Agent, for autonomous inbound conversations, meeting booking and pipeline generation. Now a Salesforce company. Three quote-only tiers.
Capabilities
Auto-Respond
Qualified
Pros & Limitations
Editorial assessmentAuto-Respond
Pros
- ✓Six lead sources answered in under 2 seconds: Yelp, Thumbtack, Facebook Messenger, Facebook Lead Ads, Instagram DMs and Google Local Services Ads.
- ✓Flat, published per-channel pricing from $19 a month with no contracts, setup fees, per-lead fees, lead caps or per-seat charges, and every feature included on every source.
- ✓Trade-software coverage: leads push to ServiceTitan, Housecall Pro, Workiz, AccuLynx, GoHighLevel and six other CRMs, and a REST Webhook plus Lead Reply API connect custom systems.
Limitations
- –Six lead sources only: the vendor lists Angi, HomeAdvisor, Nextdoor, Porch, Houzz, Bark and Networx as not supported.
- –Voice is billed separately at $10 a month per number plus $1 per minute of talk time, rounded up per call, so the source price does not cover phone answering.
- –Little independent evidence so far: a single G2 review, no reviews on Capterra or Trustpilot, and no published SOC 2, ISO 27001 or HIPAA attestation.
Qualified
Pros
- ✓Piper handles inbound buyer conversations end to end without per-step approval: qualifying intent, answering questions over video, voice or text, booking meetings and sending AI-generated follow-up email.
- ✓Integration coverage is published rather than asserted: every plan includes connections to Salesforce CRM and 20+ go-to-market systems, and the vendor keeps dedicated integration pages for eleven of them, from 6sense and Demandbase to Gong, Outreach, Salesloft and Slack.
- ✓The Enterprise API is bidirectional and documented, delivering to Snowflake, Databricks, BigQuery and Adobe AEP while also accepting writes back for leads and companies, which keeps the platform from becoming a data island.
Limitations
- –No rate is published on any tier. All three plans route to a demo request, so there is no self-serve path, no free trial and no way to size a deployment without contacting sales.
- –Setup is a 30-60 day engagement with an assigned success architect rather than a same-week configuration, and the entry tier excludes agent handoff, MCP and API access and Salesforce sandbox support, which start on Enterprise.
- –MCP is announced but not yet documented: the Enterprise tier lists MCP access and a July 2026 article announced an MCP client and server for Q3 2026, but no setup guide or endpoint is published, and the vendor advertises multi-language support without naming its languages.
Frequently asked questions
How does pricing compare between Auto-Respond vs Qualified?
Auto-Respond uses a subscription model, starting at $19 per month. Qualified uses a custom model with pricing on request.
View full Auto-Respond profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
View full Qualified profile
Pricing, reviews, integrations →
Free · Every Two Weeks
AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker
Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.

