AI Agent Index
Tabstack logo

Tabstack

4.3/ 5

by Mozilla

Editorial review
Visit site →

Mozilla-built API for AI agents to extract web data and automate browsers with schema-as-contract reliability. 10K free credits; paid plans from $99/mo.

Tabstack is a Mozilla-backed API that lets AI agents extract structured web data and automate browser actions without building or maintaining scrapers. Built on five core endpoints (extract markdown, extract JSON, generate, automate, research), it runs real browser instances rather than headless requests, which makes it more reliable on JS-heavy and dynamic sites where traditional scrapers typically break. The schema-as-contract model is the differentiator: pass a URL plus the JSON shape you want, and the API returns matching structured output every call, with explicit nulls for fields it cannot find rather than hallucinated guesses. Pricing is credit-based and transparent: 10,000 free credits to start, pay-as-you-go at $0.35 per 1k credits, or Team ($99/mo, 500K credits) and Pro ($499/mo, 3M credits) plans for production workloads. Setup takes about 30 seconds via the MCP server, which connects directly to Claude, Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex without custom integration work. Privacy posture is Mozilla-grade: ephemeral data with default purge after use, robots.txt compliant via a dedicated Mozilla Tabstack user-agent, and no model training on customer content. Limitations to know upfront: LinkedIn and G2 are intentionally not extractable by design (TOS-respecting), e-commerce sites typically require local config and threshold tuning rather than playground-ready use, and the schema model is best-effort rather than strict-contract, meaning calls return nulls for missing fields instead of failing hard. Total cost of ownership is favorable for teams replacing custom scraping pipelines: no infrastructure to maintain, predictable per-credit pricing, and overage rates that drop from $0.35/1k to $0.25/1k at the Pro tier.

Pricing

freemium · Free

Segment

b2b

Setup

easy

Verified

May 1, 2026

Capabilities

web-searchautonomousdata-analysisworkflow-builderbrowser-automation

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Pros

  • Mozilla-backed privacy posture: ephemeral data, no model training, robots.txt compliant via a dedicated user-agent that gives site owners visibility and control
  • Schema-as-contract API returns structured JSON on every call with explicit nulls for missing fields rather than hallucinated guesses, which makes downstream code easier to trust
  • 30-second MCP setup connects directly to Claude, Cursor, Claude Code, and Codex with no custom integration work required

Limitations

  • LinkedIn and G2 are intentionally blocked by design to respect TOS, so use cases requiring those sources need a different tool
  • Best-effort schema rather than strict-contract: calls return nulls for missing fields rather than failing, which requires careful null handling in downstream pipelines
  • E-commerce sites typically need local config and threshold tuning rather than working out-of-the-box from the hosted playground

Technical Details

Deployment
apicloud
Model architectureAPI
Avg setup timeUnder 5 minutes via MCP server
Autonomous rateHigh
Integrations
claudecursorclaude-codecodexmcppythontypescript

Similar agents

Rating

4.3/ 5

Editorial score

Industries

SaaSDevToolsB2BStartupsEnterpriseAgencies

Leave a review

Never displayed publicly.

Agent Stacks

See workflow stacks that feature Tabstack.

Compare

Is this your tool?

Claim this listing to update your details and get a Verified badge.

Claim listing →