AI Agent Index

Zep vs Cognee (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Zep vs Cognee: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated June 2026.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index · Updated daily

Zep logo

Zep

by Zep AI

Context engineering platform for AI agents with temporal knowledge graph, MCP server, and Graph RAG. Free tier, paid from $125/month ($104/mo annual). SOC 2 Type II and HIPAA certified.

freemiumB2B
Visit Zep
Cognee logo

Cognee

by Topoteretes

Open-source AI memory platform for agents using hybrid graph and vector architecture. ECL pipeline. $7.5M seed, 24,900+ GitHub stars. Free self-hosted; Cloud from $5/workspace/mo.

freemiumB2B
Visit Cognee
Zep
Cognee
Pricing model
freemium
freemium
Starting price
$104/mo
$5/mo
Pricing transparency
partial
public
Contract type
both
monthly
Customer segment
B2B
B2B
Deployment
cloud, self-hosted, api
cloud, self-hosted
Setup difficulty
easy
moderate
Avg setup time
Under 5 minutes (free tier with full API access, no credit card, three lines of code to production)
3-5 minutes
Editorial rating
4.3 / 5
4.1 / 5
G2 rating
No G2 listing
No G2 listing
MCP compatible
Yes
Yes
GitHub stars
28.1K
25K
Data training
not disclosed
not disclosed
Human in loop
not required
not required
Security certs
SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA
GDPR

Capabilities

Zep

data-analysisautonomousdeep-research

Cognee

deep-researchdata-analysisautonomousweb-searchworkflow-builderbyok

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Zep

Pros

  • Temporal knowledge graph automatically tracks how facts change over time: when information is updated or contradicted, Zep invalidates outdated facts while preserving historical context, making it more accurate than vector-only memory systems for complex multi-session agent workflows
  • Benchmark-leading retrieval with 80.32% accuracy at 189ms on LoCoMo and 63.8% on LongMemEval versus mem0's 49%, delivering measurably better temporal reasoning at lower latency using single-shot retrieval with no slow agentic tool-call loops
  • Graphiti MCP server gives Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP clients persistent knowledge graph memory across sessions with Python, TypeScript, and Go SDKs, webhook support, and no agent framework lock-in, backed by Fortune 500 customers including AWS and Samsung

Limitations

  • Steep pricing jump from free tier (1,000 credits per month for prototyping) to Flex at $125 per month ($104 annual) with no intermediate tier: early-stage teams and lower-volume projects that outgrow free credit limits face a significant cost increase with no middle-ground option
  • Credit-based pricing makes costs difficult to forecast at production scale: Episodes consume 1 credit per 350 bytes with auto-topup charges at 20% of monthly allocation, requiring careful per-request credit monitoring to avoid unexpected billing
  • Self-hosted Graphiti requires Docker, FalkorDB or Neo4j, and LLM API key management: teams seeking a fully managed zero-infrastructure MCP memory solution face meaningful setup and operational overhead before reaching production

Cognee

Pros

  • Knowledge graph available at every pricing tier including the free self-hosted tier. Unlike Mem0, which gates graph memory behind the $249/month Pro plan, Cognee gives teams full graph capabilities from day one without a paid upgrade.
  • ECL pipeline builds self-improving memory that gets sharper with use. Rated responses feed back into graph edge weights, so accuracy improves over time rather than staying static like vector-only systems.
  • Official MCP server with 14 specialized tools works with Claude Desktop, Cursor, Continue, Cline, and Roo Code. Supports both standalone mode for individual developers and API mode for teams sharing a single knowledge graph across multiple AI clients.

Limitations

  • Python-only SDK limits integration options. TypeScript, Go, or other language-based agent stacks cannot use Cognee natively, narrowing its addressable developer audience compared to Mem0 which supports both Python and JavaScript.
  • Smaller ecosystem than Mem0: {{github_stars}} GitHub stars versus Mem0's 48,000+ means less community content, fewer pre-built examples, and a smaller pool of developers who have solved common integration problems.
  • No published LongMemEval benchmark score. Mem0 scores 49% and Hindsight scores 91.4% on temporal reasoning benchmarks, but Cognee has not published equivalent scores, making objective capability comparison difficult for procurement teams.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Zep vs Cognee?

See the full comparison above.

Which is best for my team — Zep vs Cognee?

How does pricing compare between Zep vs Cognee?

Zep uses a freemium model, starting at $104 per month. Cognee uses a freemium model, starting at $5 per month.

View full Zep profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Cognee profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Stay ahead of the curve

The AI Agent Index Weekly — agents gaining community trust, builder wins, and what's shipping. One email a week.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.