AI Agent Index

Tines vs Viktor (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Tines vs Viktor: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated July 13, 2026 by The AI Agent Index Editorial Team.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index

Tines logo

Tines

by Tines

No-code intelligent workflow platform for security, IT and operations: AI agents, copilots, case management, and app building. Free Community Edition; enterprise custom. $272M raised, $1.125B valuation.

freemiumENTERPRISE
Visit Tines
Viktor logo

Viktor

by Zeta Labs

Slack and Microsoft Teams AI coworker that connects to 3,200+ tools, writes and runs code, and delivers real outputs: PDFs, dashboards, web apps. $50/mo after $100 in trial credits.

subscriptionB2B
Visit Viktor
Tines
Viktor
Pricing model
freemium
subscription
Starting price
Contact sales
$50/mo
Pricing transparency
partial
mostly public
Contract type
both
monthly
Customer segment
ENTERPRISE
B2B
Deployment
web, api, cloud, self-hosted
cloud
Setup difficulty
moderate
easy
Avg setup time
1-5 days for first workflow (no-code builder, pre-built templates available)
< 1 hour (one-click install from Slack App Directory, connect data sources, @mention Viktor to run first task)
Editorial rating
4.5 / 5
4.6 / 5
G2 rating
4.7/5 (400 reviews)
4.8/5 (35 reviews)
MCP
Yes
Client
GitHub stars
N/A
N/A
Data training
not disclosed
no
Human in loop
optional
optional
Security certs
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, CCPA
GDPR, CCPA

Capabilities

Tines

workflow-builderautonomousno-codeagentic-codingreportingscheduling

Viktor

autonomousworkflow-builderdata-analysisreportingcrm-syncschedulingcode-generation

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Tines

Pros

  • Full-spectrum automation in one platform: teams choose between human-led, deterministic, and agentic workflow modes per workflow, with native agent building, Workbench AI copilot, and Cases for incident management all integrated without switching tools
  • No-code drag-and-drop interface that handles mission-critical workflows: security teams with no engineering background build complex incident response automations using Story Copilot (natural language builder launched February 2026), plus Pages and Build Apps for custom internal applications on top of workflows
  • MCP server support available on all plans including the free Community Edition: build and deploy custom remote MCP servers directly on the Storyboard and connect to Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, or any MCP-compatible client in minutes

Limitations

  • Custom pricing only above the Community and Starter tiers: no published rates require a sales conversation, making budget planning and comparison against Zapier ($16/month) or n8n (free self-hosted) difficult without entering a commercial discussion
  • Security-first heritage means the platform is most mature for SecOps and ITOps workflows: teams in marketing, sales, or product may find less community content and fewer pre-built workflow templates for their use cases versus Zapier or Make
  • Free Community Edition has meaningful feature limits (1 builder, 3 flows): teams that outgrow it move to Starter Edition (self-serve, pricing not publicly published) or Enterprise (custom), with no transparent intermediate pricing between free and enterprise

Viktor

Pros

  • Executes tasks end-to-end in a persistent cloud computer: Viktor queries Salesforce, Stripe, Google Ads, and GitHub in one run and delivers a finished PDF or dashboard, not text to copy-paste into another tool.
  • Lives natively in Slack and Microsoft Teams: teams interact with Viktor like any colleague via @mention, with no separate interface or workflow to adopt, now one-click installable from the official Slack App Directory after full Slack approval.
  • Backed by the Slack co-founders and $75M in funding as of May 2026: Stewart Butterfield and Cal Henderson wrote personal checks into an AI coworker that runs inside the product they built, alongside Accel's Series A lead.

Limitations

  • Security certifications are less mature than the marketing implies. Viktor holds SOC 2 Type 1, with Type II in progress and the report only available under NDA. ISO 27001 is in progress, not certified. Buyers whose procurement requires a completed Type II or ISO 27001 should treat both as pending.
  • Credit-based pricing creates spend uncertainty for heavy users. Teams running many scheduled tasks or complex multi-tool queries monitor credit consumption carefully, with real-world spend ranging from $150 to $400 per month above the $50 headline Team plan rate.
  • No standalone web interface. Viktor requires either Slack or Microsoft Teams as the interaction layer, so teams on Google Chat, Discord, or other platforms cannot adopt it without switching.

Frequently asked questions

How does pricing compare between Tines vs Viktor?

Tines uses a freemium model with pricing on request. Viktor uses a subscription model, starting at $50 per month.

View full Tines profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Viktor profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Best Tines alternatives

See all alternatives →

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across 344+ AI agents. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.