AI Agent Index

Tines vs Clawdi (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Tines vs Clawdi — pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated June 2026.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index · Updated daily

Tines logo

Tines

by Tines

No-code intelligent workflow platform for security, IT and operations teams: builds, runs and monitors AI agents and automations. Free Community Edition, paid plans from custom pricing. $272M raised, valued at $1.125B.

freemiumENTERPRISE
Visit Tines
Clawdi logo

Clawdi

by Goodwill Labs

Cloud environment layer that runs AI agents (OpenClaw, Hermes, Claude Code, Codex) with persistent memory, skills, and integrations that survive framework switches. Free to start.

freemiumB2B
Visit Clawdi
Tines
Clawdi
Pricing model
freemium
freemium
Starting price
Contact sales
Free
Customer segment
ENTERPRISE
B2B
Deployment
web, api, cloud, self-hosted
cloud
Setup difficulty
moderate
easy
Avg setup time
1-5 days for first workflow (no-code builder, pre-built templates available)
< 5 minutes
Editorial rating
4.5 / 5
3.4 / 5

Capabilities

Tines

workflow-builderautonomousno-codeagentic-codingreportingscheduling

Clawdi

workflow-builderautonomousno-codeschedulingopen-source

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Tines

Pros

  • Full-spectrum automation in one platform: teams choose deterministic logic, human-in-the-loop, or full AI autonomy per workflow, giving security and IT teams precise control without switching tools or rebuilding workflows when requirements change
  • No-code drag-and-drop interface that handles mission-critical workflows: security teams with no engineering background build complex incident response automations using Story Copilot (natural language builder launched February 2026) that historically required developer time
  • MCP server support available on all plans including the free Community Edition: build and deploy custom remote MCP servers directly on the Storyboard and connect to Claude Desktop, Cursor, Cline, or any MCP-compatible client in minutes

Limitations

  • Custom pricing only above the Community and Starter tiers: no published rates require a sales conversation, making budget planning and comparison against Zapier ($16/month) or n8n (free self-hosted) difficult without entering a commercial discussion
  • Security-first heritage means the platform is most mature for SecOps and ITOps workflows: teams in marketing, sales, or product may find less community content and fewer pre-built workflow templates for their use cases versus Zapier or Make
  • Free Community Edition has meaningful feature limits (1 builder, 3 flows): teams that outgrow it move to Starter Edition (self-serve, pricing not publicly published) or Enterprise (custom), with no transparent intermediate pricing between free and enterprise

Clawdi

Pros

  • Framework-agnostic environment layer: switch between OpenClaw, Hermes, Claude Code, and Codex without losing memory, skills, API keys, or app connections, solving the real switching cost that causes most people to abandon personal agent setups
  • Intel TDX hardware-encrypted workspaces provide cryptographically verifiable privacy rather than a policy promise, meaningful for users running agents with access to credentials and sensitive business data
  • MCP-native architecture serves memory, vault, and connector tools via Model Context Protocol, meaning any MCP-aware agent can connect to the Clawdi environment layer automatically without custom integration code

Limitations

  • Credit-based pricing with no monthly rollover: 5,000 free credits deplete quickly under browser automation or multi-tool workflows; validate actual credit burn rate on the free tier before committing to a paid plan
  • No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 certification published: Intel TDX is a hardware encryption feature, not an independently audited compliance certification, meaning enterprise procurement teams with formal security requirements cannot self-serve compliance documentation
  • Early stage with evolving documentation and enterprise features still in development: 5,000 plus users since February 2026 but multi-workspace team management and granular access controls are not yet available on self-serve plans

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Tines vs Clawdi?

See the full comparison above.

Which is best for my team — Tines vs Clawdi?

How does pricing compare between Tines vs Clawdi?

Tines uses a freemium model. Clawdi uses a freemium model, starting at $0 per month.

View full Tines profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Clawdi profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Best Tines alternatives

See all alternatives →

Stay ahead of the curve

The AI Agent Index Weekly — agents gaining community trust, builder wins, and what's shipping. One email a week.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.