AI Agent Index

Roo Code vs Refact.ai (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Roo Code vs Refact.ai: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated July 2026.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index · Updated daily

Roo Code logo

Roo Code

by Roo Code

Open-source VS Code AI coding agent with Code, Architect, and Debug modes. Repo archived May 2026 as company pivoted to Roomote. Free, BYOK, Apache-2.0. 24.2k GitHub stars.

freeB2B
Visit Roo Code
Refact.ai logo

Refact.ai

by Refact

Open-source community-maintained AI coding agent with local-first BYOK deployment. Refact Cloud retired April 2026. VS Code, JetBrains, MCP. Free and open source.

freeENTERPRISE
Visit Refact.ai
Roo Code
Refact.ai
Pricing model
free
free
Starting price
Contact sales
Contact sales
Pricing transparency
public
public
Contract type
monthly
monthly
Customer segment
B2B
ENTERPRISE
Deployment
ide
ide, self-hosted
Setup difficulty
moderate
moderate
Avg setup time
< 15 minutes (install VS Code extension, configure LLM API key, select first mode and prompt)
Under 1 hour: install IDE plugin, install local Refact engine, configure BYOK provider or local model runtime, first agent task
Editorial rating
3.8 / 5
3.2 / 5
G2 rating
No G2 listing
4.3/5 (1 reviews)
MCP compatible
Yes
Yes
GitHub stars
24.3K
3.5K
Data training
not disclosed
no
Human in loop
optional
optional
Security certs
None confirmed
None confirmed

Capabilities

Roo Code

agentic-codingmulti-file-editingidebyokopen-sourcegit-native

Refact.ai

autocompletecode-generationbyokopen-sourcemulti-file-editing

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Roo Code

Pros

  • Specialized mode architecture produces more focused results than general-purpose AI: Code, Architect, and Debug modes each have tailored prompts, tool permissions, and context strategies, reducing the generic output quality gap that single-mode chat interfaces produce on specific workflow types.
  • Fully model-agnostic with BYOK across 50+ providers including Ollama local models: developers optimize cost and capability per task using Claude for complex reasoning, DeepSeek for cost-sensitive operations, and local models for privacy-sensitive codebases where cloud inference is restricted.
  • Apache-2.0 license with 3,300 forks and 7,073 commits: the full codebase is available for audit, self-hosting, and community-led continued development independent of the original Roo Code Inc. team, which has pivoted to a different product.

Limitations

  • Repository archived May 15, 2026: Roo Code Inc. has pivoted to Roomote and the original Roo-Code GitHub repository is now read-only with no further development planned from the original team, making Cline or OpenCode better choices for teams that need ongoing maintenance and security updates.
  • No commercial support, SLA, or compliance certifications: community support depended on GitHub Issues and Discord, and with the original team no longer active on the project, support for new issues is limited to community forks and the existing VS Code extension documentation.
  • Company has moved to a different product category: Roo Code Inc. is now building Roomote, a Slack-based AI engineer for operational work, meaning organizational continuity, licensing questions, and commercial arrangements can no longer be handled through the original development team.

Refact.ai

Pros

  • Exceptionally broad BYOK provider support with zero commission: OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, Groq, xAI, plus local runtimes Ollama, LM Studio, and vLLM, with no markup on any provider billing.
  • Fully local-first architecture with no vendor dependency: Refact runs entirely from the IDE with user-configured providers, all data stays on the developer's machine, and the open-source codebase is auditable and forkable.
  • Rich agent integration surface for a local tool: shell, browser automation, GitHub/GitLab, databases, Docker, MCP, and CLI integrations give the autonomous agent meaningful access to the developer's full workflow.

Limitations

  • No commercial backing or paid support after cloud retirement: the project is community-maintained with no SLA, no dedicated support team, and no commercial entity guaranteeing ongoing development or security updates.
  • Original GitHub repository archived May 30, 2026: development moved to a community fork, creating fragmentation in documentation, issues, and community resources that increases adoption risk for new users.
  • Local-first deployment requires meaningful setup investment: developers must install the local engine, configure BYOK providers or local runtimes, and manage their own infrastructure, unlike hosted alternatives that work immediately after signup.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Roo Code vs Refact.ai?

See the full comparison above.

Which is best for my team — Roo Code vs Refact.ai?

How does pricing compare between Roo Code vs Refact.ai?

Roo Code uses a free model. Refact.ai uses a free model.

View full Roo Code profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Refact.ai profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Related comparisons

Roo Code vs Kilo Code

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across 330+ AI agents, verified against live vendor data every 14 days.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.