AI Agent Index

Refact.ai vs Roo Code (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Refact.ai vs Roo Code: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Last updated August 17, 2026 by The AI Agent Index Editorial Team.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index

Refact.ai logo

Refact.ai

by Refact

Open-source community-maintained AI coding agent with local-first BYOK deployment. Refact Cloud retired April 2026. VS Code, JetBrains, MCP. Free and open source.

freeENTERPRISE
Visit Refact.ai
Roo Code logo

Roo Code

by Roo Code

Open-source VS Code AI coding agent with Code, Architect and Debug modes. Shut down May 15, 2026 and frozen at v3.54.0, but still installable. Continued by the Zoo Code community fork. Apache-2.0, BYOK.

freeBOTH
Visit Roo Code
Refact.ai
Roo Code
Pricing model
free
free
Starting price
Contact sales
Contact sales
Pricing transparency
public
public
Contract type
monthly
monthly
Customer segment
ENTERPRISE
BOTH
Deployment
ide, self-hosted
ide
Setup difficulty
moderate
moderate
Avg setup time
Under 1 hour: install IDE plugin, install local Refact engine, configure BYOK provider or local model runtime, first agent task
< 15 minutes (install VS Code extension, configure LLM API key, select first mode and prompt)
Editorial rating
3.2 / 5
3.8 / 5
G2 rating
4.3/5 (1 reviews)
No G2 listing
MCP
Client
Client
GitHub stars
3.5k
24.3k
Data training
no
not disclosed
Human in loop
optional
optional
Security certs
None confirmed
None confirmed

Capabilities

Refact.ai

autocompletecode-generationbyokopen-sourcemulti-file-editing

Roo Code

agentic-codingmulti-file-editingidebyokopen-sourcegit-native

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Refact.ai

Pros

  • Exceptionally broad BYOK provider support with zero commission: OpenAI, Anthropic, Gemini, DeepSeek, OpenRouter, Groq, xAI, plus local runtimes Ollama, LM Studio, and vLLM, with no markup on any provider billing.
  • Fully local-first architecture with no vendor dependency: Refact runs entirely from the IDE with user-configured providers, all data stays on the developer's machine, and the open-source codebase is auditable and forkable.
  • Rich agent integration surface for a local tool: shell, browser automation, GitHub/GitLab, databases, Docker, MCP, and CLI integrations give the autonomous agent meaningful access to the developer's full workflow.

Limitations

  • No commercial backing or paid support after cloud retirement: the project is community-maintained with no SLA, no dedicated support team, and no commercial entity guaranteeing ongoing development or security updates.
  • Original GitHub repository archived May 30, 2026: development moved to a community fork, creating fragmentation in documentation, issues, and community resources that increases adoption risk for new users.
  • Local-first deployment requires meaningful setup investment: developers must install the local engine, configure BYOK providers or local runtimes, and manage their own infrastructure, unlike hosted alternatives that work immediately after signup.

Roo Code

Pros

  • Specialized mode architecture produces more focused results than general-purpose AI, because Code, Architect and Debug modes each carry tailored prompts, tool permissions and context strategies rather than a single general chat.
  • Fully model-agnostic through BYOK, with 24 documented provider integrations including Anthropic, OpenAI, Google Gemini, DeepSeek, Bedrock and Vertex, plus OpenAI-compatible endpoints and local models via Ollama and LM Studio.
  • Apache-2.0 licensed with more than 3,400 forks, so the full codebase stays available for audit, self-hosting and community-led continuation, and it is carried forward by the Zoo Code fork.

Limitations

  • Roo Code Inc. shut the extension down on May 15, 2026 and archived the repository the same day. It is read-only, with no further development, bug fixes or security patches from the original team. The company points users to the Zoo Code community fork and to Cline.
  • No commercial support, SLA or compliance certifications. Community support ran through GitHub Issues and Discord, and with the original team no longer active, help for new issues comes only from community forks and the existing documentation.
  • The original team has moved on. Roo Code Inc. now builds Roomote, a separate cloud coding agent, so continuity, licensing and commercial questions can no longer go to the original team. The community-run Zoo Code fork is the maintained path.

Frequently asked questions

How does pricing compare between Refact.ai vs Roo Code?

Refact.ai uses a free model with pricing on request. Roo Code uses a free model with pricing on request.

View full Refact.ai profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Roo Code profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Related comparisons

Roo Code vs Kilo Code

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.