AI Agent Index

Oz vs Torq (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of Oz vs Torq: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Built from The AI Agent Index's verified listing data. Oz last verified July 20, 2026. Torq last verified September 18, 2026.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index

Oz logo

Oz

by Anyreach

Oz by Anyreach is an AI teammate across Slack, Teams, email, voice, and web that returns finished work. Credit-metered from $33/seat/mo billed annually (USD); every send, payment, or delete waits for one-tap approval.

subscriptionB2B
Visit Oz
Torq logo

Torq

by Torq

Torq is an AI SOC platform where AI agents triage, investigate, and respond to security threats autonomously. Built for enterprise security teams with Hyperautomation for workflow orchestration. Custom pricing.

customENTERPRISE
Visit Torq
Oz
Torq
Pricing model
subscription
custom
Starting price
$33/mo, billed annually
Contact sales
Pricing transparency
mostly public
quote only
Contract type
both
annual only
Customer segment
B2B
ENTERPRISE
Deployment
cloud, web, api, mobile, desktop
cloud, web, api
Setup difficulty
easy
complex
Avg setup time
< 1 hour (start free, install into Slack, Teams, Gmail, or Outlook, then ask Oz in plain language to run the first task)
About 1 month to implement, per the G2 reviewer average (Time to Implement). Torq does not publish a setup duration and offers no self-serve trial.
Editorial rating
On Our Radar
4.4 / 5
G2 rating
No G2 listing
4.8/5 (152 reviews)
MCP
Server
Client
GitHub stars
N/A
N/A
Data training
no
no
Human in loop
optional
optional
Security certs
SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, AIUC-1
SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, BSI C5

Capabilities

Oz

autonomousworkflow-builderdata-analysisreportingcrm-syncscheduling

Torq

autonomousworkflow-builderdata-analysisreporting

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

Oz

Pros

  • Oz delivers finished work rather than chat replies: ask it in plain language from Slack, Teams, Gmail, Outlook, a call, or the web, and it returns research briefs, slide decks, spreadsheets, and pipeline updates across your connected tools in a single run. Pricing is outcome-metered rather than token-based, so a credit maps to a unit of work done and costs stay legible.
  • Human control is built into every consequential action: reads run silently, while every send, payment, merge, or delete posts a one-tap Approve or Reject card. Teams can set which lower-risk actions auto-approve, which makes Oz a strong fit for security-conscious teams that want autonomy without handing over unattended write access.
  • Unusually deep integration and security posture for an early-stage product. It offers 3,000+ integrations with named bidirectional connectors like Salesforce, HubSpot, Stripe, GitHub, and Notion, plus an API-first design and a first-party MCP server that external clients such as Claude or Cursor can query. It is backed by an independently audited SOC 2 Type II report, HIPAA, and AIUC-1, and customer content is never used to train foundation models.

Limitations

  • Credit-metered pricing means the $33 Solo seat is a floor, not a ceiling: the 800 included credits are a soft budget and heavy users pay per-credit overage on top of the seat fee.
  • No independent track record yet: Oz is an early-access product from a 2024 company with no third-party reviews on G2, Trustpilot, or Product Hunt, so buyers cannot yet triangulate quality.
  • Several controls are gated or pending: shared memory, SSO, and pipeline access require higher tiers, and GDPR, ISO 27001, and PCI DSS are still in progress on the trust center, not certified.

Torq

Pros

  • Torq states that over 90% of cases on its platform are remediated completely autonomously, and Carvana reports that Torq Agentic AI handles 100% of its Tier 1 security alerts.
  • Integrations run in both directions across 300 pre-built integrations and 4,000+ pre-built steps, so agents take in alerts from tools such as CrowdStrike and Okta and act back on them, with a public REST API and MCP client support.
  • Holds SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001 and BSI C5, signs a HIPAA Business Associate Agreement, and contractually bars training AI models on customer data without written consent.

Limitations

  • Pricing is not published on torq.io and there is no free tier or self-serve trial. Evaluation starts with a demo request, and AWS Marketplace purchases run on 12-month contracts.
  • G2 reviewers report an average of one month to implement, and value depends on connecting the SIEM, EDR, identity, cloud and ticketing tools a team already runs.
  • Socrates is pre-configured to request user confirmation for actions that require approval, so how much response runs unattended depends on which actions a team approves in advance.

Frequently asked questions

How does pricing compare between Oz vs Torq?

Oz uses a subscription model, starting at $33 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more). Torq uses a custom model with pricing on request.

View full Oz profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full Torq profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.