AI Agent Index

kapa.ai vs screenpipe (2026)

Side-by-side comparison of kapa.ai vs screenpipe: pricing, capabilities, integrations, deployment complexity, and ratings. Built from The AI Agent Index's verified listing data. kapa.ai last verified September 25, 2026. screenpipe last verified September 17, 2026.

Data sourced from The AI Agent Index

kapa.ai logo

kapa.ai

by kapa.ai, Inc.

kapa.ai turns technical docs, code, tickets and community threads into cited answers for AI agents through a retrieval API, a hosted MCP server and pre-built agents. 14-day free trial, then quote-only plans.

usage-basedB2B
Visit kapa.ai →
screenpipe logo

screenpipe

by Negentropy Labs, Inc.

Local-first screen and audio memory for AI agents: screenpipe captures your desktop activity, keeps it on your machine, and serves it to MCP clients through a local server with two documented tools.

freemiumBOTH
Visit screenpipe →

Affiliate link. We may earn a commission at no cost to you.

kapa.ai
screenpipe
Pricing model
usage-based
freemium
Starting price
Contact sales
$21/mo, billed annually
Pricing transparency
quote only
mostly public
Contract type
annual only
both
Customer segment
B2B
BOTH
Deployment
cloud, api, web, self-hosted
desktop, cli, api
Setup difficulty
moderate
moderate
Avg setup time
Days: the vendor states most teams are live within days, in less than 7 days, and the 14-day trial is self-serve with a work email.
< 15 minutes (download the desktop app, grant screen recording and accessibility permissions, connect one MCP client). The vendor quickstart claims five minutes.
Editorial rating
4.4 / 5
4.0 / 5
G2 rating
4.8/5 (42 reviews)
No G2 listing
MCP
Server
Server
GitHub stars
N/A
21.6k
Data training
not disclosed
no
Human in loop
optional
optional
Security certs
SOC 2 Type II, GDPR
SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA

Capabilities

kapa.ai

ragcitationsknowledge-basemcp-serverchatdeflectionomnichannelautonomous

screenpipe

screen-capturecontext-memorylocal-firstmcp-serverbyok

Pros & Limitations

Editorial assessment

kapa.ai

Pros

  • ✓Every generated answer carries inline citations to the customer's own sources, and it is designed to say it does not know when those sources do not cover a question.
  • ✓One knowledge base serves the Retrieval API, a hosted MCP server and pre-built agents for a website widget, Slack, Discord, a support form, Zendesk and in-product use.
  • ✓Ingests more than 20 source types, from documentation sites, GitHub and OpenAPI specs to Zendesk tickets, Confluence and Notion, with continuous sync on paid plans.

Limitations

  • ⚠Growth and Enterprise are quote-only, commercial plans carry a minimum annual commitment, and there is no self-serve card signup.
  • ⚠Private sources, continuous sync, zero data retention and PII masking start on Growth, and SSO, SCIM, role-based access control and EU hosting are Enterprise features.
  • ⚠The hosted MCP search tool returns results in about 3 seconds at the median and 4.5 seconds at the 95th percentile, and public OAuth servers allow 600 searches per user per day.

screenpipe

Pros

  • ✓Local-first by architecture rather than by policy: capture, storage and search all sit on your own machine, cloud model calls send only the query, and Ollama support means the whole loop can run without a single cloud call.
  • ✓A first-party MCP server rather than a claim: npx -y screenpipe-mcp exposes search-content and export-video over a local REST API on port 3030. It installs with one click into Claude Desktop from the app's own settings panel, with documented stdio setups for Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, Cursor and Warp.
  • ✓A free plan on one device and two published paid rates: Basic at $21 per month billed annually, and Business at $500 per seat per year, with a seven-day onboarding trial that requires a payment method. Getting running is a desktop install on macOS, Windows or Linux against a documented five-minute quickstart.

Limitations

  • ⚠The trust portal lists SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA as compliant. The vendor's security page describes ISO 27001 as in progress and not yet certified, and GDPR, HIPAA and CCPA as internal programs and assessments rather than third-party certifications. Independent review volume is two Product Hunt reviews and a G2 profile with no reviews yet.
  • ⚠Section 4 of the terms has the user consent, by using the service, to the vendor creating Deidentified Data and Analytics Data from usage and using it to improve and train its models. Customer content, output and personal information are excluded without separate written agreement.
  • ⚠The public source is under the Screenpipe Commercial License rather than an OSI license: personal, non-commercial and evaluation use can be free, and commercial use requires a paid license. Continuous recording uses roughly 30 GB of local disk per month.

Frequently asked questions

How does pricing compare between kapa.ai vs screenpipe?

kapa.ai uses a usage-based model with pricing on request. screenpipe uses a freemium model, starting at $21 per month on an annual commitment (month-to-month costs more).

View full kapa.ai profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

View full screenpipe profile

Pricing, reviews, integrations →

Free · Every Two Weeks

AI Agent Price & Rating Tracker

Price changes, new agent launches, acquisitions, and rating updates across the AI agent market. Verified against live vendor data, not vendor marketing.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime. We never share your email.