Augment Code vs Sourcegraph (2026)

Augment Code

by Augment

Sourcegraph

by Sourcegraph

Pros

• ✓Standard ($20) and Business ($100) are flat monthly prices for up to 50 seats, with the included usage pooled across the whole team and no per-seat charge.
• ✓The Context Engine indexes entire repositories, or several at once, and is also sold as Context Engine MCP for other agents such as Claude Code and Cursor.
• ✓Cosmos starts agent work from GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Linear and Jira events, schedules and webhooks, and carries it through to a reviewed pull request.

Limitations

• –LLM usage is billed at the provider list price plus a flat 40% service fee, and usage beyond the included amount is bought as top-ups.
• –SSO with OIDC and SCIM, CMEK, ISO 42001, SIEM integration and data residency options are on the custom-priced Enterprise plan only.
• –Harness acquired Cosmos, the Auggie CLI and the Context Engine on 8 October 2026, and Augment had not yet said how existing plans will change.

Pros

• ✓Deep Search reasons across every indexed repository and shows the repositories, files, commits and diffs behind each answer, for engineers and for agents through the MCP server.
• ✓Agentic Batch Changes takes a change described in plain language, opens changesets across every affected repository and repairs failures until CI passes.
• ✓Runs as single-tenant cloud or self-hosted and syncs from Tier 1 code hosts including GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Gerrit and Azure DevOps.

Limitations

• –Enterprise plan only, starting at $16,000 on a minimum annual contract, with trials arranged through sales rather than self-serve sign-up.
• –AI features draw on credits allocated per user, with larger volume credit buckets sold as an add-on.
• –The cloud terms state that the service is not intended to meet HIPAA obligations and that Sourcegraph is not a HIPAA business associate.